FrenziedFifth

Just another Edublogs site

Fitting the Pieces Together

From behaviorism to social learning and everything else in between, people have been trying to understand how people learn for at least 2000 years. The topic of the mind and learning seems to date back to Ancient Greece. Throughout the centuries, many have tried to explain the human mind and how it works. However, in the nineteenth century, advancements in science and technology finally allowed psychologists to gain a better understanding of the human mind, beginning with behaviorism. As society and our world continue to evolve, as well as continued advancements in the field of science and technology, more and more learning theories have gained momentum.

Throughout this course, learning theories have been the focal point of many assignments and discussions. As a teacher in the field of education for fifteen years, learning theories have been ingrained into my teaching philosophy. Through learning about the brain itself and how it works (Ormrod, Schunk & Gredler, 2009), I have gained a better understanding of cognitivism. What I thought was particularly interesting in this course, was reading about and participating in a debate over whether or not neuroscience should influence education. I understand both sides of the argument. Another great opportunity with the course was being able to complete the learning matrix that detailed each learning theory. Through that experience, I found myself comfortable with several learning theories and not just one. Looking back at Kapp’s (2007) blog post, I agree with Kapp on how he was trying to validate that no one learning theory can be all encompassing to explain the human brain and its processes. It is, rather, a collection of the -isms that comprise the workings of information processing and the behaviors that follow. This was eye opening, because as a teacher and lifelong learner, I have felt that I utilize many tenets of several learning theories in both my personal learning career and my professional teaching career. Overall, I learned that having a theory or model is an important prerequisite for quality curriculum design. Henson (2015) referred to a model like painting or a story, which is either written or visually represented, that describes one’s perception of reality.

Over the past few weeks, I was able to look inward and identify a learning challenge of my own. Through this process I learned a challenge I have with encoding, which is one of the three main cognitive processes (Ormrod in Laureate Education, n.d.). It was interesting to take in the experience of admitting a flaw in my own learning process. I think it helped me become a better educator because I am able to consider my own challenges when looking at the challenges my students may be facing. Another takeaway from this course was exploring and studying adult learning. According to Conlan, Grabowski, and Smith (2003), there are five assumptions that compose the basis of adult learning: the individual must be able to self-direct their learning; the individual must have an abundance of life experiences that provide a bedrock for new learning, in individual must have learning goals and needs that are tied to social roles; the individual is interested in applying the knowledge and skills obtained; and the the individual is motivated to learn on their own accord. Since this is my second online masters program, the tenets of adult learning made a lot of sense to me. Overall, I learned that learning is both similar and different in youths and adults. 

Finally, I have found that technology plays an integral role in the learning we participate in today in the 21st century. Technology can be used with each learning theory that we studied in this course. From using technology to monitor behaviors (behaviorism) to using technology to learn from each other socially. Technology has a role in learning and it is here to stay. What fascinates me most about technology and learning is that technology can enable students to learn at their own pace. Additionally, technology can help teachers reach students to meet their needs in new and different ways like never before. According to Waddell (2015), technology has been used to help improve and facilitate learning experiences that allow both student and teacher to gather, access, analyze, present, and transmit information quickly and efficiently. 

In closing, learning theories are well researched and well understood. The world is constantly changing, and thus humans are changing as well. As the human mind evolves to meet the demands of the new world in front of us, new and different learning theories will emerge just the way they have done in the past. It surely is an exciting time to study the mind and human development. 

 

References

Conlan, J., Grabowski, S., & Smith, K. (2003). Adult learning. In M. Orey (Ed.), Emerging perspectives on learning, teaching, and technology. Retrieved from http://textbookequity.org/Textbooks/Orey_Emergin_Perspectives_Learning.pdf

Henson, K.T. (2015). Curriculum planning: Integrating multiculturalism, constructivism, and 

education reform (5th ed.). Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press

Kapp, K. (2007). Out and about: Discussion on educational schools of thought. Retrieved from https://karlkapp.com/out-and-about-discussion-on-educational/

Laureate Education (Producer). (n.d.b.). Information processing and problem solving [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

Ormrod, J., Schunk, D., & Gredler, M. (2009). Learning theories and instruction (Laureate custom edition). New York, NY: Pearson.

Waddell, J. (2015). The role of technology in the educational process. Michigan State University College of Education. Retrieved from https://education.msu.edu/green-and-write/2015/the-role-of-technology-in-the-educational-process/.

 

No Comments »

Connectivism Reflection

According to Utecht and Keller (2019), considering yourself “educated” in today’s world does not mean you can simply memorize information or know a plethora of facts. Rather, it is an individual’s ability to learn, then unlearn, and relearn information and facts quickly enough to apply what you know to this ever-changing world and landscape (Utecht & Keller, 2019). My learning connections have changed the way I learn. With access to information, answers to my questions at my fingertips, and a range of social networks both in-person and online, I am able to make decisions faster. According to Orey (2010), part of the learning process is about making decisions. With so many avenues to turn to for answers, I am able to learn more quickly and make more decisions as a result. 

There are many digital tools that one can use in today’s world to facilitate learning. For me, the Internet and social media platforms are the two that bring me the fastest results. For example, if our vacuum breaks, I can use the internet, likely Youtube, to search and find a solution to my problem. Before my search, I would not know how to fix vacuums, but after my search, I am able to apply the new knowledge gained to my situation. 

When I have questions that require me to gain new knowledge, I have several avenues to find answers. One way is to use the Internet and conduct a search. A second way is to use social media. For example, if I have a question about something in my children’s school district, I can post it to Facebook and a social network of other parents or people in the community will reply with answers. Another way is to conduct research, particularly for graduate school. I can use the Walden Library and search a plethora of articles and digital books for answers. Finally, as a professional with a professional social network of colleagues and administrators, I can turn to them for advice or with my questions. This can be done in person, via email, or on Zoom. 

According to Siemens (2005), there are eight principles of connectivism, which support the ways in which I learn through connectivism. As previously mentioned, and noted by Siemens (2005), one principle refers to decision making and how it is part of the learning process. Another principle involves nurturing connections in social networks and maintaining them to make connections for continual learning (Siemens, 2005). Goldie (2016) shared that learning truly occurs when networks are traversed, constructed, and participation in activities within the  networks will strengthen learning connections. I feel I abide by this principle when I am meeting with other professionals and participating in professional development networks. In addition, if I am interested in learning something that is not necessarily related to my profession, I can traverse through personal social networks of people. Lastly, Siemens (2005) shared that a diversity of opinions contributes to learning. I feel when I find varying opinions online or within my personal social networks, I retain more information and gain new knowledge and perspective. Overall, all of the principles of connectivism represent how I learn in one way, shape or form. 

 

References

Goldie, J. G. S. (2016). Connectivism: A knowledge learning theory for the digital age? Medical Teacher, 38(10), 1064–1069. https://doi-org.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/10.3109/0142159X.2016.1173661

Orey, M. (2010). Connectivism. Emerging Perspectives on Learning, Teaching, and Technology. http://textbookequity.org/Textbooks/Orey_Emergin_Perspectives_Learning.pdf

Siemens G. 2005. Connectivism: a learning theory for the digital age. Int J Instr Technol Dis Learn 2:1–8; [cited 2015 Aug]. Available from: http://www.itdl.org/Journal/Jan_05/article01.htm.

Utecht, J., & Keller, D. (2019). Becoming relevant again: Applying connectivism learning theory to today’s classrooms. Critical Questions in Education, 10(2), 107–119.

No Comments »

Connectivism Mind Map

Connectivism Mind Map

No Comments »

Skip to toolbar